PERENCANAAN ARSITEKTUR SISTEM INFORMASI KEIMIGRASIAN PADA PLBN TERPADU DI NTT
Useful information system to support of business process an organization/company with no eception immigration authority. Business process that so far has been implemented have not use information technology maximally resulted in a fall in the passer the limits for the low service quality to the unfixed data storage and difficulty for finding data and produce reports. The purpose of the research are to design a cross platform information system architecture to support the business process carried out by the immigration authorities on three (3) Integrated Cross Border Posts (PLBN) under the control of the Class II Immigration Office of Atambua, East Nusa Tenggara. For the purposes of the architecture planning was using the framework of TOGAF ADM based on mapped problems, while the design of the information system is based on the PIECES framework. Information systems that proposed aims to solve the problems faced by and to support policy and the government's national strategies in the management of the border region. It is expected that the design of cross platform information system applied to linking immigration offices, immigration officers in PLBN and the passer. The results of this research are expected to be implemented in support of the business process on the immigration authorities with linking immigration offices, immigration officers in PLBN and the passer and also to improve the services of the immigration officer.
Chircu, A., and Lee, D. 2003. “Understanding IT Investments In The Public Sector: The Case Of E-Government”. Proceedings of the Ninth Americas Conference on Information Systems. Florida, December 31, 792-800.
Rocheleau, B., and Wu, L. 2002. “Public Versus Private Information System: Do They Differ In Important Ways? A Review And Empirical Test”. American Review of Public Administration32. 4, 379-397.
Farnham, D., and Horton, S. (1996). Managing The New Public Services. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kamal, M.M. 2006. “IT Innovation Adoption In The Government Sector: Identifying The Critical Success Factors”. Journal of Enterprise Information Management19. 2, 192-222.
Efendi. 2014. “Studi tentang pelayanan publik Pas Lintas Batas (PLB) Krayan-Ba’kelalan Malaysia di Kantor Imigrasi Kecamatan Krayan Kabupaten Nunukan”. eJournal Ilmu Administrasi Negara 3. 2, 613-627.
El-Sawy, O. (2001). Redesigning Enterprise Processes For e-Business. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Suhendri. 2016. “Perancangan Arsitektur Sistem Informasi Sekolah Dengan The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) (Studi Kasus: Pondok Pesantren Ar-Rahmat)”. Infotech Journal 1. 2, 40-47.
Suryadi dan Andry, J.F. 2017. “Perancangan Enterprise Architecture Mengunakan TOGAF Architecture Development Method (Studi Kasus: Yakuza Gym Jakarta Barat). Seminar Nasional Teknoka 2, Jakarta, November 4, 29-34.
Sutabri, T. (2012). Konsep Sistem Informasi. Yogyakarta: Andi Publisher.
Yakub. (2012). Pengantar Sistem Informasi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Whitten, J. L., and Bentley, L. D. (2007). Systems Analysis And Design MethodsPaperback.New York: McGraw-Hill.
Dube, M.R., and Dixit, S.K. 2011. “Comprehensive Measurement Framework For Enterprise Architectures”. International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology (IJCSIT)3. 4, 71-92.
The Open Group. (2009). The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF), Version 9, Evaluation Copy, Document Number: G091. San Francisco: The Open Group.
Proper, E., and Greefhorst, D. 2011. “Principles In An Enterprise Architecture Context”. Journal of Enterprise Architecture7. 1, 8-16.
Yunis, R., dan Surendro, K. 2009. “Perancangan Model Enterprise Architecture Dengan Togaf Architecture Development Method”. Jurnal Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi (SNATI) 6, Yogyakarta, Juni 20, 25-31.
Menchaca, A.G.V., et al.2013. “Practical Application Of Enterprise Architecture, Study Case Of SME Metalmechanic in Mexico”. European Scientific Journal 1, 233-241.