Analisa Perbandingan Rumus Haversine Dan Rumus Euclidean Berbasis Sistem Informasi Geografis Menggunakan Metode Independent Sample t-Test

  • Retno Palupi Universitas Kristen Surakarta
  • Diyan Ayuk Yulianna Universitas Kristen Surakarta
  • SM Santi Winarsih Universitas Kristen Surakarta
Keywords: Haversine formula, Euclidean formula, geographic, information system, Independent Sample t-Test Method

Abstract

Comparative Analysis of the Haversine Formula and the Euclidean Formula based on Geographical Information Systems which aims to analyze and compare the measurement results of the two formulas whether there are significant differences to the distance measured based on geographic information systems. Research objects used to collect distance data are several bank offices in the city of Solo. The method used in this research is to create a geographic information system application using web-based programming using the PHP (Pearl Hypertext Prepocessor) programming language, with the MySQL database. Measurements were carried out on two formulas, namely the Haversine formula and the Euclidean formula and obtained data in the form of distances in kilometers (km) which were obtained from the program system, then the data was processed using Statistical Product and Service Solution (SPSS) 23 software. is the Independent Sample t-test method. From the data analysis, the conclusion is that there is no significant difference in the calculation of the distance between the Haversine formula and the Euclidean formula. The Independent Sample T Test method is able to analyze the comparison of distance measurements using the Haversine formula and the Euclidean formula does not have a significant difference, meaning that the variants of the two formulas are the same.

 

Kata Kunci : Haversine   formula,    Euclidean  formula ,   geographic  

                       information system, Independent Sample  t-Test Method

References

A. Aini, “Sistem Informasi Geografis Pengertian dan Aplikasinya,” Diakses Dari http//stmik. amikom. ac. id/[Diakses 24 Maret 2013], 2007.

S. Umar, Rusydi ; Wardana, “Sistem Informasi Geografis Objek Wisata Di Kabupaten Kuantan Singingi,” Pros. SNSebatik, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2017.

D. Prasetyo, K. Hastuti, and M. Kom, “Penerapan Haversine Formula Pada Aplikasi Pencarian Lokasi Dan Informasi Gereja Kristen Di Semarang Berbasis Mobile.”

K. M. Wibowo, I. Kanedi, and J. Jumadi, “Sistem Informasi Geografis (SIG) Menentukan Lokasi Pertambangan Batu Bara di Provinsi Bengkulu Berbasis Website,” J. Media Infotama, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2015.

Y. Miftahuddin, S. Umaroh, and F. R. Karim, “Perbandingan Metode Perhitungan Jarak Euclidean, Haversine, Dan Manhattan Dalam Penentuan Posisi Karyawan,” J. Tekno Insentif, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 69–77, 2020, doi: 10.36787/jti.v14i2.270.

M. K. Canggih Ajika Pamungkas, “Aplikasi Penghitung Jarak Koordinat Berdasarkan Latitude Dan Longitude Dengan Metode Euclidean Distance Dan Metode Haversine,” J. Inf. Politek. Indonusa Surakarta, vol. 5, pp. 8–13, 2019.

Herispon, “Modul Statistical Package for the Social Sciences ( SPSS ) Panduan Pengolahan Data Penelitian Menggunakan SPSS 23 Bagi Mahasiswa HERISPON Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Riau Pekanbaru , 2020,” no. July, 2020.

Published
2021-07-29
How to Cite
Palupi, R., Yulianna, D. A., & Winarsih, S. S. (2021). Analisa Perbandingan Rumus Haversine Dan Rumus Euclidean Berbasis Sistem Informasi Geografis Menggunakan Metode Independent Sample t-Test. JITU : Journal Informatic Technology And Communication, 5(1), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.36596/jitu.v5i1.494
Section
Articles